Fujifilm X-S20: specifications and reviews
[[span class='fa']][[/span]] Camera
Product images (click to enlarge):
Specifications
General characteristics
Fujifilm
X-S20
One time
Fujifilm X-S20 | |
Mirrorless | |
2023-05-24 | |
Yes | |
€ 1430 | |
$ 1299+VAT | |
491 gr. | |
128 mm. | |
85 mm. | |
65 mm. | |
26 | |
APS-C | |
23.5 mm. | |
15.6 mm. | |
1.53 | |
3:2 | |
Yes | |
No | |
160 | |
12800 | |
JPEG, RAW, HEIF, TIF 8 bit, TIF 16 bit | |
425 | |
-7.0 EV | |
Embedded, full | |
AF down to -7 EV with phase detection (-4 EV with contrast detection) | |
Yes | |
Mechanical and Electronic | |
8.0 frame/sec. | |
20.0 frame/sec. | |
8.0 frame/sec. | |
20.0 frame/sec. | |
79 | |
256 | |
1/32000 sec. | |
1/4000 sec. | |
Yes | |
1/180 sec. | |
750 shots | |
30 fps with electronic shutter and 1.25x crop up to 407 JPEG or 88 compressed RAW | |
Electronic (EVF) | |
100% | |
0.62x (35mm. equiv) | |
2.36 million | |
3.0 in. | |
1.84 megapixel | |
Full | |
Settings, Tap to focus | |
Yes | |
Full HD @ 24/25/30p, Full HD @ 50/60p, Full HD @ 100/120p, Full HD @ 200/240p, 4k @ 24/25/30p, 4K @ 50/60p, 6.2K @ 24/25/30p | |
1.00 | |
H.264, H.265 | |
RAW at 12 bit | |
4k @ 24/25/30p, 4K @ 50/60p | |
Yes | |
Yes | |
Yes | |
No | |
No | |
Microphone, Phones, HDMI, USB3, Power, USB-C, External flash | |
SD, SD UHS-II | |
WiFi, Bluetooth |
Useful Links
- DPReview
[[strong]]8.6[[/strong]]/10
It is a surprisingly capable APS-C camera, giving you 2020 flagship-level performance for a reasonable price. It lacks the autofocus performance of its competitors, but it makes up for that by cramming in a ton of features for videos and photos alike [...]. It shoots charming, high-quality images, solid 4K video and arguably has more character than its competitors.
Optyczne
[[strong]]7.3[[/strong]]/10
In terms of overall features, the X-S20 is slightly better than the previous model [burst, battery, autofocus tracking]. [...] Nevertheless, it is disturbing that it is not strong about tonal and dynamic range with respect to its predecessor. Also stabilizer effectiveness seems worse.